28 Jan 2011 Fee Schedule Changes to Impact Radiologists
Diagnostic Imaging | Just when we thought it was safe to go back in the water…
President Obama’s signing of the Medicare and Medicaid Extenders Act of 2010 (MMEA) in December 2010 essentially delayed the much talked about 23 percent reduction to the Medicare Conversion Factor for physician payments associated with the sustainable growth rate formula.
As the physician community in general uttered a cautious sigh of relief, those of us in radiology began to assess and analyze the 2011 fee schedule. Many are anxiously wondering if the reduction in the utilization rate factor would finally bring the PE relative value unit (RVU) value below the HOPPS Cap rate, thus lowering technical reimbursement for MRI and CT exams.
The good news is that the utilization rate factor did not have the devastating impact on the technical reimbursement for MRI and CT that was expected. Overall, technical payments for MRI have been reduced by about 3.5 percent, with CT realizing a roughly 1 percent increase. The specific impact on an individual practice basis will depend on its specific procedure mix within these modalities.
Unfortunately, it appears that several other changes to the Medicare Part B Physician Fee Schedule payment system will have a relatively significant impact on radiology revenue’s in 2011. Specifically, two major issues will affect us in 2011:
First, CMS made an adjustment to the RVU values to reflect the revised Medicare Economic Index (MEI) weights. To make those changes budget neutral, CMS had to make an adjustment to the conversion factor for 2011. Effective January 1, 2011, the conversion factor was reduced to $33.9764, down from $36.8729 in 2010.
The second impact will come from the new code for CT of the abdomen and pelvis. Previously, practices billed two separate codes for these procedures. The reduction to professional reimbursement associated with CT of the abdomen and pelvis is 27 percent for the more common with contrast procedure. The reduction to technical reimbursement is about 42 percent compared with the first half of 2010 when the reduction in technical reimbursement for contiguous body parts was 25 percent, and about 34 percent compared with the second half of 2010 when the reduction for contiguous body parts was increased to 50 percent. Depending on an individual practice’s volumes of these procedures, the impact could be substantial.
Read more on DiagnosticImaging.com.